In my craft or sullen art Exercised in the still nightWhen only the moon ragesAnd the lovers lie abed With all their griefs in their arms, I labour by singing lightNot for ambition or bread Or the strut and trade of charms On the ivory stages But for the common wages Of their most secret heart.
Not for the proud man apart From the raging moon I write On these spindrift pages Not for the towering dead With their nightingales and psalms But for the lovers, their arms Round the griefs of the ages, Who pay no praise or wages Nor heed my craft or art.
--Dylan Thomas
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Monday, June 29, 2009
People Who Should Be Beaten With Shovels (Part Two)
Sunday, June 28, 2009
Saturday, June 27, 2009
For those of us who secretly believe that gangster movies are the only ones worth making - despite our obsequious lip service to Truffaut and Antonioni - the timing could not be better. Aficionados of gangster movies view reality as a daisy chain connecting one gangland saga to the next, with ordinary life - family, children, career, lunch - occurring in between. We do not need an uninterrupted stream of gangster movies to survive, and we certainly do not need half-hearted twaddle like Knockaround Guys to function properly - but we cannot tolerate long gaps between high-quality releases.
...in a summer when filmgoers must rely upon Jack Black, Will Ferrell and Christian Bale for thrills, even the most dismal gangster movie is a more appealing option. After taking in a few of these films, it will immediately become apparent to even the most prissy, lily-livered moviegoer why gangster films have retained their wide appeal since their inception. They never have people like Kate Hudson or Emma Thompson in them. And so far they have steered clear of Orlando Bloom.
Thursday, June 25, 2009
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Richard Rorty on Fundamentalism
“It seems to me that the regulative idea that we heirs of the Enlightenment, we Socratists, most frequently use to criticize the conduct of various conversational partners is that of ‘needing education in order to outgrow their primitive fear, hatreds, and superstitions’ ... It is a concept which I, like most Americans who teach humanities or social science in colleges and universities, invoke when we try to arrange things so that students who enter as bigoted, homophobic, religious fundamentalists will leave college with views more like our own ... The fundamentalist parents of our fundamentalist students think that the entire ‘American liberal establishment’ is engaged in a conspiracy. The parents have a point. Their point is that we liberal teachers no more feel in a symmetrical communication situation when we talk with bigots than do kindergarten teachers talking with their students ... When we American college teachers encounter religious fundamentalists, we do not consider the possibility of reformulating our own practices of justification so as to give more weight to the authority of the Christian scriptures. Instead, we do our best to convince these students of the benefits of secularization. We assign first-person accounts of growing up homosexual to our homophobic students for the same reasons that German schoolteachers in the postwar period assigned The Diary of Anne Frank... You have to be educated in order to be ... a participant in our conversation ... So we are going to go right on trying to discredit you in the eyes of your children, trying to strip your fundamentalist religious community of dignity, trying to make your views seem silly rather than discussable. We are not so inclusivist as to tolerate intolerance such as yours ... I don’t see anything herrschaftsfrei [domination free] about my handling of my fundamentalist students. Rather, I think those students are lucky to find themselves under the benevolent Herrschaft [domination] of people like me, and to have escaped the grip of their frightening, vicious, dangerous parents ... I am just as provincial and contextualist as the Nazi teachers who made their students readDer Stürmer; the only difference is that I serve a better cause.”
– ‘Universality and Truth,’ in Robert B. Brandom (ed.), Rorty and his Critics (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000), pp. 21-2
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Ebert Gone Wild
"Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" is a horrible experience of unbearable length, briefly punctuated by three or four amusing moments. One of these involves a dog-like robot humping the leg of the heroine. Such are the meager joys. If you want to save yourself the ticket price, go into the kitchen, cue up a male choir singing the music of hell, and get a kid to start banging pots and pans together. Then close your eyes and use your imagination.
The plot is incomprehensible. The dialog of the Autobots, Deceptibots and Otherbots is meaningless word flap. Their accents are Brooklyese, British and hip-hop, as befits a race from the distant stars. Their appearance looks like junkyard throw-up. They are dumb as a rock. They share the film with human characters who are much more interesting, and that is very faint praise indeed.
The movie has been signed byMichael Bay. This is the same man who directed "The Rock" in 1996. Now he has made "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen." Faust made a better deal. This isn't a film so much as a toy tie-in. Children holding a Transformer toy in their hand can invest it with wonder and magic, imagining it doing brave deeds and remaining always their friend. I knew a little boy once who lost his blue toy truck at the movies, and cried as if his heart would break. Such a child might regard "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" with fear and dismay.
The human actors are in a witless sitcom part of the time, and lot of the rest of their time is spent running in slo-mo away from explosions, although--hello!--you can't outrun an explosion. They also make speeches like this one by John Turturro: "Oh, no! The machine is buried in the pyramid! If they turn it on, it will destroy the sun! Not on my watch!" The humans, including lots of U.S. troops, shoot at the Transformers a lot, although never in the history of science fiction has an alien been harmed by gunfire.
There are many great-looking babes in the film, who are made up to a flawless perfection and look just like real women, if you are a junior fanboy whose experience of the gender is limited to lad magazines. The two most inexplicable characters are Ron and Judy Witwicky (Kevin Dunn and Julie White), who are the parents of Shia LaBeouf, who Mephistopheles threw in to sweeten the deal. They take their son away to Princeton, apparently a party school, where Judy eats some pot and goes berserk. Later they swoop down out of the sky on Egypt, for reasons the movie doesn't make crystal clear, so they also can run in slo-mo from explosions.
The battle scenes are bewildering. A Bot makes no visual sense anyway, but two or three tangled up together create an incomprehensible confusion. I find it amusing that creatures that can unfold out of a Camaro and stand four stories high do most of their fighting with...fists. Like I say, dumber than a box of staples. They have tiny little heads, except for Starscream®, who is so ancient he has an aluminum beard.
Aware that this movie opened in England seven hours before Chicago time and the morning papers would be on the streets, after writing the above I looked up the first reviews as a reality check. I was reassured: "Like watching paint dry while getting hit over the head with a frying pan!" (Bradshaw, Guardian); "Sums up everything that is most tedious, crass and despicable about modern Hollywood!" (Tookey, Daily Mail); "A giant, lumbering idiot of a movie!" (Edwards, Daily Mirror). The first American review, however, reported that it "feels destined to be the biggest movie of all time" (Todd Gilchrist, Cinematical). It’s certainly the biggest something of all time.
Monday, June 22, 2009
Sam's Movie Round-Up
Sunday, June 21, 2009
Ustad Ali Akbar Khan
Friday, June 19, 2009
Grad School Woes, Part 2
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Grad School Woes
ENGLISH 805
Pearls and Pagans, Princes and Plowmen: Middle English Alliterative Poetry
Instructor: D. Coley
ENGLISH 810: Studies in Theory I
Instructor: C. Lesjak
ENGLISH 832
Instructor: L. Davis
Print-Culture Designated
ENGLISH 835: Studies in Contemporary Literature
State Capitalism and Print, Visual, and Sonic Cultures in the Fiction of Elfriede Jelinek
Instructor: P. St. Pierre
ENGLISH 843
Diaspora and Nation in Métis Writing
Instructor: S. McCall
ENGLISH 860
Instructor: P. Cramer
Monday, June 15, 2009
Saturday, June 13, 2009
Minnesota declaration: truth and fact in documentary cinema
| ||
Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Tuesday, June 9, 2009
Schwarzenegger, trying to plug a budget hole of $24.3bn (£15bn), thinks he can make savings by getting rid of what he decries as expensive textbooks. "It's nonsensical and expensive to look to traditional hard-bound books when information today is so readily available in electronic form," Schwarzenegger wrote. "Especially now, when our school districts are strapped for cash and our state budget deficit is forcing further cuts to classrooms, we must do everything we can to untie educators' hands and free up dollars so that schools can do more with fewer resources."
Arnold, I think you're a hell of an actor. Between Twins, Kindergarten Cop, True Lies and Total Recall, you've proven that you don't need even a rudimentary command of the English language to be a great movie star. I'm not being insincere when I say that I really like some of your films--especially the scene in Commando where you shop for weapons, that shit was awesome. No one can launch a steam pipe into the gut of a guy named Bennett like you can.
Monday, June 8, 2009
Saturday, June 6, 2009
Memo to CBS Re: Frankenstein, ME
Friday, June 5, 2009
...perhaps it's done already, perhaps they have said me already, perhaps they have carried me to the threshold of my story, before the door that opens on my story, that would surprise me, if it opens, it will be I, it will be the silence, where I am, I don't know, I'll never know, in the silence you don't know, you must go on, I can't go on, I'll go on.


